Fuad Next Court intelligence · 68 Brazilian courts covered

The platform that reads the court from the inside.

Public data from Brazil's 68 courts turned into navigable pages. Every court, chamber, bench, judge, practice area and legal thesis gets its own address, with calibrated charts, peer comparison, and answers that always cite the source.

Let’s talk See what it ships
Golden rule: no source, no answer. Every claim carries the original passage and the PDF behind it.
See the Next chat in action
/chat · STJ · statute of limitations Illustrative data with source
Question What is the STJ's current position on the statute of limitations for collection actions against public entities?
Fuad Next anti-hallucination reviewer · ok 12s ago

The limitations period is five years, counted from the date of the act or fact that gave rise to the claim.S1S2 Once interrupted, the period restarts at half its length, never less than two years.S3

S1
REsp · STJ
REsp 2.071.749/PR · Repetitive Theme 1.199
2023 · 1st Section
S2
Súmula
Súmula 85/STJ · actio nata and starting term
binding
S3
Statute
Decree 20.910/32 · art. 9
in force
Search or skip…

Fuad Next uses only public data and gives back what was always there, just scattered. A glass courthouse: every panel, judge, area and thesis becomes a navigable page, with a calibrated chart and a link to the next level.

01

Broad layer

68 courts via DataJud/CNJ: volume, average time, backlog, distribution by case class.

68
02

Deep layer

Published rulings read by the platform: statutes, theses, rapporteurs, connections. Grows court by court.

∞
03

Navigable pages

Every bench, chamber, panel, judge, area and thesis has a fixed address. Peer comparison runs automatically.

↪
04

Natural language

Ask in plain language, get an answer with mandatory citation. Automatic reviewer before every response.

What it ships

Four reading layers on the court.

From a plain-language question to the page of each judge, via the map of who decides alongside whom. Every layer has its own address and talks to the others.

The dashboard covers all 68 courts from day one. The pages that depend on content analysis (judge profiles, source-backed search, connection map) grow in stages: STJ is live, TJBA is being integrated.
01 · Search that cites the source

Ask in plain language. Get back the exact passage with the original PDF behind it.

Searches three ways at once (meaning, connections across statute/ruling/judge, and exact term) with an automatic reviewer that checks whether the answer is really backed by the cited sources. Not a chatbot that invents precedent.

hybrid RAGCRAGinline citationssource paneloriginal PDF
Illustrative data
What is the STJ's position on moral damages for wrongful credit-bureau listings when the consumer already has other restrictions on file?
Settled case law excludes damages when there is a prior legitimate listing S1, unless the contested listing is for a significantly higher amount S2. Súmula 385/STJ is the mandatory starting point S3.
S1REsp 1.704.002/SP · 3rd Panel · rapporteur Min. Helena Vasques2022
S2REsp 2.085.917/RJ · 4th Panel · rapporteur Min. Roberto Alencar2024
S3Súmula 385/STJ · wrongful listing and moral damagesbinding
02 · Profiles of who decides

Where this judge tends to grant relief, and where they don't.

Every rapporteur has their own outcome × area matrix. The same judge can be tough on consumer law and lenient on social security. The page shows the actual distribution, filterable by case class and period, before the oral argument, the request for review, or the decision to settle.

outcome × area matrix5 tabsego-graph
Illustrative data
Min. Helena Vasques STJ · 3rd Panel · last 24 months
Areas Outcome × area Classes Network
Granted Partial Denied
Consumer 72% 18% 10%
Social security 68% 21% 11%
Tax 22% 17% 61%
Criminal 18% 14% 68%
1,422rulings in 12 months
4×3matrix with period filters
03 · Connection map

Every judge is also a set of ties.

The panel they sit on, the colleagues who follow their vote, the statutes they cite, the rulings they sign. The map makes explicit what usually takes weeks of reading to notice.

judge tiesstatute · panel · colleaguevisible patterns
Illustrative data
judge
entity
04 · Full court dashboard

Live indicators, heat map by chamber, narratives generated every 24 hours.

The platform spots statistical anomalies and writes 3 to 5 highlights in plain language. Instead of a raw spreadsheet, the dashboard tells you where to look, and why.

DataJud · CNJaggregation-firstLLM narrativeswatchlistalert feed
Illustrative data
TJBA · snapshot of the last 30 days
updated 41 min ago · narratives 2 h ago · 3 highlights · 1 alert
184,022new cases filed
67%case-closure rate
+9%backlog
Highlight · 2 h agoIn April, the 3rd Civil Chamber cut grants of relief in consumer cases by 41%, outside the 12-month historical pattern.
Alert · 41 min agoThe 9th Civil Court of Salvador has 312 cases ready for decision pending over 90 days, a growing backlog since February.
Who it fits

Who uses it, and for what.

It doesn't invent a new branch of law. It gives one place where what the courts already publish openly becomes actionable information, in language a lawyer reads.

01

High-volume litigation

Knowing the pace of a chamber before filing an appeal, which time of year the court speeds up, where the average time is distorted. Turns into a real strategic edge.

02

Small and mid-size firm partners

Unit profiles and the court dashboard become direct input for deciding internal case distribution and where to invest.

03

In-house legal at scale

Banks, retailers, telecoms, health plans: a watchlist of key units plus an alert feed becomes preventive intelligence. You catch that a chamber has shifted before getting blindsided in three cases in a row.

04

Research and data journalism

The dashboard covers 68 courts, and the plain-language chat over aggregated data becomes a fast research tool without needing to know query language.

Where we are

A live platform, not a wireframe.

Code running, database populated, data ingested, dashboards wired. The broad layer already covers all 68 courts. The deep layer grows in stages, prioritized by real demand.

In use

Ready and in use

  • Broad layer covering all 68 Brazilian courts via DataJud.
  • Deep layer live on the STJ, rulings from 2022 onward.
  • Natural-language search with mandatory citation and an anti-hallucination reviewer.
  • Court dashboard with narratives generated every 24h across all 68.
  • Side-by-side comparison and follow lists with configurable alerts.
Next steps

What comes next

  • TJBA: deep enrichment bringing in the appellate judges and chambers of the Bahia court.
  • Progressive expansion to other courts along the roadmap.
  • Thesis layer: automatic clustering of legal theses with adoption timeline per court.
  • Case-tracking integration: alerts crossing the decision pattern of the rapporteur drawn for your case.
Next step

Want to see Fuad Next on your court?

Let's book a 30-minute demo. You bring three real cases and we open the pages that matter (rapporteur, chamber, case class) live.

Let’s talk Send an email
  • 01You send three real cases (rapporteur, class, thesis).
  • 02We open the matching pages live.
  • 03You leave knowing whether it fits, with no extra promises.